City Council Nixes plan to ease police residency rules
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
Last night a majority of the city council in my hometown decided all policemen who work for the city must live within the city limits. The proposal to allow policemen to live outside city limits had the endorsement of the city mayor, the county mayor, the police chief, the police association, Fedex and other powerful corporations, the six white city council men and practically every citizen in the city including yours truly.
But not the seven black city councilmen. Their reason: the city is not doing enough to hire black policemen. Hell are they blind? All they got to do is look in a patrol car, go visit a precinct or read the newspaper. The Commercial Appeal reported between 2006 and 2008, black applicants accounted for 57 to 65 percent of new officers hired, mirroring the demographic makeup of my hometown this according to U.S. Census Bureau statistics.
Also during the same period 2,644 black men and women applied to be police officers 332 were hired. Over the same period, 1,024 white men and women applied and 222 were hired.
One reason for denying this proposal was one councilmen had received information from unidentified individuals who said they were unfairly turned away. Councilman Harbert, they weren't turned away. They just didn't show up. According to police records most applicants are rejected because they simply don't show up.
In 2006, 25 percent of applicants were disqualified as "no shows." The number was 23 percent in 2007 and 25 percent through June 1 of this year.
The next biggest reason for disqualification is failure of physical or written tests. which also mirrors the population of the city. Most of us are fat and stupid and don't show up to work
The third major reason is the psychological exam. Between 2006 and June 1 of this year, 12 to 20 percent of the applicants were rejected because of the psychological test. I've often said there are some scary people running loose in my city now I got statistics to back me up.
I wonder if our esteemed council people even bother to read such things or know a statistic when they see it. My opinion is they just like to stir things up. I really believe there is something going on below the surface. The folks want something from the present administration. The police chief has asked madam council women Harbert for a list of names of the unidentified people so he can review their application and provide help. The chief is dying to hire people.
As of today Harbert has provided no list.
Why did these councilmen really vote against this proposal? Why do they give flimsy excuses for their vote? Another councilman, Harold Collins, said he wants policemen who are loyal to the city and living within its limits is such proof. Maybe to this particular councilman, but I could be just as loyal and live somewhere else. If the councilman was laying in a pool of his own blood a victim of a armed robbery would he ask the cop his mailing address? In fact in the proposal a recruit would have six months to move to the city and then the loyalty could start. Mr Collins failed to see this part of the proposal, I guess.
If you ask me these guys are crime lords, members of a crime syndicate and more cops mean less graft in their pockets because in this town money talks. Give these folks a satchel full of Franklins and watch the vote change.
That's the way I see it,
Brando Pines
black cops,
graft,
police department,
white cops. 

I want this guitar. Wanna help me get it? For more information leave a comment.

